Like everyone else out there, I wanted to know what happens after someone illegally crosses the border and what was going on with these "asylum seekers" after they got into America, so I went inside non-profits as a" volunteer" and shelters to get some answers.
I went undercover and volunteered for an NGO, which is short for non-government organization, typically a nonprofit. You've probably seen NGOs on the news without even knowing it. These are the organizations reporters try to get into with locked doors.
Besides getting in, I took on multiple roles as a volunteer. I was there when they helped asylum seekers with their paperwork, airport transfers, and getting them through TSA.
With the videos and documents I have, it quickly becomes clear just how many gaps there are in the system after someone illegally enters the southern border, including their redistribution to various cities.
Most people investigating the process started at the border and have tried to follow the story from there. I started in a "sanctuary city" and worked my way south.
"Rubber Stamp" sums up what I witnessed. This is an actual form I got from the person it was issued to, and its rubber-stamped "refused to sign."
If this was an American citizen, they'd have to sign any legal paperwork and could be charged with perjury for lying. Based on my insider experience, this is a common occurrence, indicating the existence of two distinct sets of standards, as Ted Cruz pointed out.
In December of last year, Senator Ted Cruz wrote a letter to Alejandro Mayorkas expressing his concern that the TSA's screening procedures are aiding illegal aliens in boarding airplanes and endangering national security.
Sen. Cruz was right about being concerned because the TSA relies on the documents provided by US Customs and Border Patrol for identification. You can walk across the border and wait for border patrol, and then you can give them any name you choose. If you're not already in the system, there's no way for them to verify your identity. In May, under the Biden administration, CBP discontinued DNA testing, which has raised a significant level of concern that should have sparked alarm nationwide.
It is a concern that "families" are crossing into this country without any means of confirmation regarding their relationship.
A valid reason for being granted asylum is fear of persecution. I have seen the documentation filled out by people who answered "no" to that question. They were not concerned about persecution, yet they were let in.
In this document, his answer to the question of what your purpose of being in the US was, "My purpose was to live a better life in Kentucky for as long as I'm allowed to stay," and on the following line, he answered, "No" to fear of persecution if he returned to his home country. Answering no disqualifies him from applying for asylum, but I'm watching him use a non-profit-purchased airline ticket to travel anywhere nationwide. The NGO didn't ask any questions to confirm his information.
An article by The New York Times outlined the process, but once you see these documents, it becomes clear that reality does not align with what is supposed to happen.
In an upcoming series of articles and interviews, I'll provide a detailed account of everything I witnessed, from the government bus transfers to non-profits purchasing airline tickets, navigating airport security, handling documents, and exposing what I learned about trafficking.
Half the battle is knowing what you're up against, and it's time we talk about solutions to fight back. Watch for @LetsTalkDGU on social media for updates.
I went undercover and volunteered for an NGO, which is short for non-government organization, typically a nonprofit. You've probably seen NGOs on the news without even knowing it. These are the organizations reporters try to get into with locked doors.
Besides getting in, I took on multiple roles as a volunteer. I was there when they helped asylum seekers with their paperwork, airport transfers, and getting them through TSA.
With the videos and documents I have, it quickly becomes clear just how many gaps there are in the system after someone illegally enters the southern border, including their redistribution to various cities.
Most people investigating the process started at the border and have tried to follow the story from there. I started in a "sanctuary city" and worked my way south.
"Rubber Stamp" sums up what I witnessed. This is an actual form I got from the person it was issued to, and its rubber-stamped "refused to sign."
If this was an American citizen, they'd have to sign any legal paperwork and could be charged with perjury for lying. Based on my insider experience, this is a common occurrence, indicating the existence of two distinct sets of standards, as Ted Cruz pointed out.
In December of last year, Senator Ted Cruz wrote a letter to Alejandro Mayorkas expressing his concern that the TSA's screening procedures are aiding illegal aliens in boarding airplanes and endangering national security.
Sen. Cruz was right about being concerned because the TSA relies on the documents provided by US Customs and Border Patrol for identification. You can walk across the border and wait for border patrol, and then you can give them any name you choose. If you're not already in the system, there's no way for them to verify your identity. In May, under the Biden administration, CBP discontinued DNA testing, which has raised a significant level of concern that should have sparked alarm nationwide.
It is a concern that "families" are crossing into this country without any means of confirmation regarding their relationship.
A valid reason for being granted asylum is fear of persecution. I have seen the documentation filled out by people who answered "no" to that question. They were not concerned about persecution, yet they were let in.
In this document, his answer to the question of what your purpose of being in the US was, "My purpose was to live a better life in Kentucky for as long as I'm allowed to stay," and on the following line, he answered, "No" to fear of persecution if he returned to his home country. Answering no disqualifies him from applying for asylum, but I'm watching him use a non-profit-purchased airline ticket to travel anywhere nationwide. The NGO didn't ask any questions to confirm his information.
An article by The New York Times outlined the process, but once you see these documents, it becomes clear that reality does not align with what is supposed to happen.
In an upcoming series of articles and interviews, I'll provide a detailed account of everything I witnessed, from the government bus transfers to non-profits purchasing airline tickets, navigating airport security, handling documents, and exposing what I learned about trafficking.
Half the battle is knowing what you're up against, and it's time we talk about solutions to fight back. Watch for @LetsTalkDGU on social media for updates.
For corrections or revisions, click here.
The opinions reflected in this article are not necessarily the opinions of LET
Comments