NAUGATUCK, CT - On October 14, 2023, a criminal named Jarrell Day stole six packs of beer, totaling approximately $200, from a Stop & Shop grocery store in Naugatuck, a suburb of Waterbury. It was alleged that Day not only stole the beer but used force to carry out the theft, which raised the charge from larceny to robbery, which is a felony.
Police responded to the scene, including Officer Nicholas Kehoss, age 36, married and the father of two. The officers made contact with Day, sitting in the driver’s seat of a vehicle. He was commanded to shut off the car and exit the vehicle. He then proceeded to flee at a high rate of speed, crashing into two police cruisers in the process.
Day drove away and eventually crashed the vehicle and then fled on foot through an open field with Kehoss in pursuit. Kehoss deployed his department-issued Taser, and Day fell to the ground. Kehoss commanded him to get on his stomach, an order which he refused to comply with. He was tased a second time, and this application was effective, at least temporarily.
Kehoss put his Taser back in the holster, grabbed Day’s right arm, and tried to bring it behind his back to handcuff him. Day then began to actively resist, and Kehoss warned Day that he would be “tased” again if he did not comply. He removed the Taser from its holster, and as Day continued to offer resistance, Kehoss used a “drive stun” with the unit on Day’s back. Day finally relented and allowed Kehoss to handcuff him.
Day, who suffered no injuries, was arrested and charged with attempted second-degree assault, third-degree robbery, assault on a police officer, illegal possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle, second-degree larceny, reckless driving, operating under suspension, and evading responsibility.
After the incident, the Naugatuck police, under the direction of Chief Colin McAllister, initiated a use-of-force review, which is typical for such cases. McAllister told NBC 30 that upon reviewing the footage of Kehoss’s body-worn camera, it raised some concerns about his use of the Taser during the arrest.
“In our department, whenever there’s a use of force, it automatically triggers an internal review. That internal review process moves up the chain of command. Early on in that process, we identified several concerns with this use of force,” McAllister said at a news conference at the time. The case was then referred to the Waterbury State’s ATtorney’s Office, which then referred the case to the Connecticut State Police for investigation.
State police charged Kehoss with third-degree assault and intentional cruelty to persons after their investigation.
Day, who was previously convicted in a separate case of Resisting Arrest and received 364 days in jail, execution suspended, and a conditional discharge, pleaded guilty to Larceny in the 6th degree and failure to appear on the same charge. He again received 364 days in jail, execution suspended, and three years probation.
He also pleaded guilty to evading responsibility and received the same sentence, which appears to run concurrently with the other criminal charges. So, for committing a robbery, slamming into two police cruisers, and resisting arrest, Day will not do a single day in jail.
Officer Kehoss has a court hearing scheduled at Waterbury Superior Court, 400 Grand Street, Waterbury, on Friday, March 7.
Cathleen Walsh, a law enforcement advocate and administrator of Blue Lives Matter CT, organized a rally in support of Kehoss on his court date from 1:00 pm until 3:00 pm.
“This entire situation from day one was poorly handled, in my opinion. No charges should ever have been made against this officer,” Walsh told LET. “It is clear to see that he utilized his taser, a less lethal option, only until he was able to apprehend this noncompliant, violent criminal, a criminal that just rammed into his cruiser and fled. He had to assume he may be armed.
“It is time we start supporting our men and women who serve and protect us, or soon, who will step up to do so?”
Walsh has set up a Facebook page in support of Officer Kehoss.
Comments
2025-03-07T19:13-0500 | Comment by: Mary
Connecticut State Police need to be fired. We need the police to handle this rampant lawlessness to is abounding. Don't tie their hands!
2025-03-07T20:25-0500 | Comment by: arthur
You got to be kidding me, a cop shoots some criminal for a good reason, he gets into trouble, he uses a taser or stun gun, which people call for as a second choice, and he gets into trouble anyway, and the bad guy walks free. What the heck? Why even bother? We need to get with the program, and start to deal with these idiot prosecutors and judges that are the REAL problem and leave the cops to do the dirty work and put some responsible adults in charge of the rest of the legal system for a change...
2025-03-07T21:35-0500 | Comment by: Darel
Just like in so many other cases the judiciary will take cases to to inforce there own views on the public it's evil and we need to fix it
2025-03-08T06:49-0500 | Comment by: Ron
Im new to this site. Do you guys know the case of Trevor Kirk LASD. Federally convicted for using pepper spray on a robbery suspect.
2025-03-08T20:19-0500 | Comment by: natalie
I have never read of such a lopsided case as this is. For the Officer to be the accused and this perp to just walk away is complete injustice towards the officer who was doing his job. Any wonder no one wants to be a PO anymore!!
2025-03-09T14:07-0400 | Comment by: Chris
Judicial activism is a big problem in this country. If the standards of the law were actually upheld, hundreds if not thousands of judges would be removed for perverting the law to fit their personal agendas.
2025-03-10T14:19-0400 | Comment by: Jay
Our cameras are like Bowie Knives. They cut both ways. They can show that are actions are justified or they can catch us when we are doing something wrong. In this case we have two issues outside of whether or not the use of force was legal or within departmental policy. The first is adrenaline. You can hear the officer's voice raised in pitch. It is clear that adrenaline has kicked in. This can have an effect on rational thought processes and duration dilation. The officer can perceive that it is taking longer for a person to comply than it really is. We also, routinely, switch to using coarser language to make our point to the su spect that we mean business. Unfortunately the viewer of a video may react to it as an indiaction that the officer is in a brutal frame of mind. That could end up with unfortunate results when a juror, judge or even prosecutor reacts to it. We need to consider these factors when we are calm and ajust our behavior when we are acting under stress. NOTE: I am not a doctor, this is just my experience and assessment having been in the business for years.
2025-03-12T14:18-0400 | Comment by: thomas
Insane.