New York Times coins the most insulting, marginalizing name for biological women- 'non-transgender women' as if that's the norm

image
Transgender by is licensed under Canva

If you wonder why the American people put Donald Trump back in the White House, you only need to look at the latest absurdity coming from the “newspaper of record,” the New York Times. The next time you hear liberals claim that Republicans are trying to “erase women,” direct them to this. 

Over the past few years, we have seen liberals try to erase females from women’s sports by pushing to have men who pretend to be women taking spots from biological women. All the progress made in the “women’s movement” has been unwound seemingly overnight. 

A couple of years ago, the word “woman” or “women” was removed from the lexicon in favor of the disgusting term “birthing person,” as if that is the only role women serve. You would be wrong if you thought it couldn’t get worse than that insulting term. 

In a piece discussing NCAA regulations on allowing “trans” women to play, for example, volleyball, the article said the following: 

“...the NCAA says trans volleyball players are eligible to play if their testosterone level is less than 10 nonomoles per liter–that’s at least four times more than what many experts say is the top of the range for non-transgender women, and in the typical range for adult men." [emphasis added]

Non-transgender women?” That is how they are now referring to biological women? This is nothing less than a feeble attempt to marginalize the term women while tying it to the cult of transgenderism. What’s next, a biological man is going to be referred to as a “non-transgender man? 

This term, a complete insult to real women, is the latest in a series of offensive terms aside from the aforementioned “birthing person.” Women have been referred to as a “uterus haver,” “menstruator,” and “vaginal presenting.” 

No such demeaning terms are offered for men (yet). For all the bloviating the left screams about regarding the “patriarchy,” they sure don’t have an issue with removing “women” from the equation. Is it any wonder many people have tired of the whole trans shtick? 

Funny, the same people who accused Republicans of wanting to create a 2024 version of “The Handmaid’s Tale” have no problem implementing their own version. How long are real women going to put up with this nonsense? 

Needless to say, the New York Times was lit up on X. 











Women's tennis great Martina Navratilova even stepped into the fray:



Conservative commentator Michael Savage had a famous saying and wrote a book by the same name: "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder." The New York Times proves that every day. 
 
For corrections or revisions, click here.
The opinions reflected in this article are not necessarily the opinions of LET
Sign in to comment

Comments

Rick

Wait... I'm not sure if I agree or disagree. "Normal" women are not transgender, they are biological "women." Transgender women are men with a mental illness. Why can't we just get back to "facts" and get rid of all this nonsense?

Powered by LET CMS™ Comments

Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

© 2024 Law Enforcement Today, Privacy Policy