What home improvement retailers Home Depot and Lowe’s are positioning as measures to combat retail theft is drawing concerns and criticisms from would-be patrons of the establishments regarding privacy concerns, as license plate readers at said retailers’ parking lots are cropping up to combat theft.
According to a report from Fox News, Home Depot and Lowe’s locations across Connecticut have started introducing cameras in their parking lots with automated license plate readers, which have the capability to record the front and back of vehicles while logging details such as time and location of the vehicle.
Critics of the anti-theft measure find the surveilling tools encroach on the privacy of those shopping at such retail giants, with a New York Post article highlighting the move is “prompting worries that the technology can amass data about consumer behavior that can be accessible to law enforcement, hackers, private investigators or even misused internally.”
Some of these very concerns have manifested into lawfare against Home Depot, with a class action suit spawning earlier in May in California accusing the home improvement store of hosting the obtained data in “a searchable database accessible to law enforcement agencies across the United States.”
However, Home Depot has since issued a statement regarding said concerns, highlighting how such cameras have been used by the retailer for several years and that access to the information stored is not freely accessible to federal law enforcement.
“We've had parking area security cameras in place at our stores for many years, as many retailers do. These cameras are used solely as a security measure to prevent theft and protect the safety of our customers and associates in our stores. We do not grant access to our license plate readers to federal law enforcement,” the statement from the company reads.
Yet, as pointed out in the Fox News report, the statement provided by Home Depot only mentions federal law enforcement and doesn’t divulge whether state and local law enforcement are afforded some sort of privileged access to the data. Furthermore, at least in Connecticut, Fox News mentions various police departments have “entered into written agreements with retailers to receive automatic or continuous access to cameras at certain stores.”
While the motives for hosting these cameras are sound, insofar as curtailing theft and keeping parking lots safe for customers and employees alike while also being available as a tool for law enforcement during investigations, the debate on privacy is likely not going anywhere anytime soon.
Comments