NEW HAMPSHIRE - Officials in Hanover and Lebanon are revisting their immigration policies after the state Legislature passed two laws that require communities and police departments in New Hampshire to work with federal immigration enforcement.
The goal for both communities is to comply with the new laws without compromising community values, according to town officials. Officials have drafts and are preparing to hear from residents during the first week of November before they are finalized. The new laws go into effect January 2026, NHPR reported.
Both Hanover and Lebanon have been under scrutiny from the state and federal government for the immigrant-friendly policies. In May, both towns appeared on the list of "Sanctuary Jurisdictions Defying Federal Law," which was compiled by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The list has since been updated and neither community is currently listed. It is unclear if they were removed since the Legislature passed the new laws. Since Governor Kelly Ayotte signed the two anti-sanctuary laws in mid-May, local officials have to figure out whether to change these policies or face prosecution from the New Hampshire Attorney General and lose 25% of their state funding.
If they do not comply, Hanover risks losing about $350,000 unless they change a 2020 fair-and-impartial policing policy that prevents town police from asking people about their immigration status or cooperating with ICE. Specifically, the town could lose a significant portion of their rooms and meals tax revenue, as well as state highway grants.
After the two laws were signed, several Hanover residents encouraged the selectboard to oppose ICE during a Town Meeting in late May. They voted in favor or a warrant article to not partner with federal immigration enforcement.
However, with the new laws going into effect in January, the Hanover selectboard met on Monday, October 20 to edit the policy. They voted in favor of a draft resolution that would comply with state law, but go no further.
"It's crystal clear that the Hanover PD will cooperate with ICE if there are reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, not just randomly," said Selectboard Member Joanna Whitcomb. Before the change can be made final, residents will have the chance to share their opinions at a public hearing on November 3.
Lebanon is in a similar situation. It has a welcoming ordinance in place that could clash with the new state laws. The city's draft resolution says that officials are allowed to cooperate with ICE if they get a judicial warrant or a right to now request.
City Manager Andrew Hosmer said the issue is scheduled for a city council meeting on November 5 and the public is welcome to attend. "No final decision has been made," he said. "The city remains committed to following the law, while upholding the community's values of being welcoming and inclusive for all residents."
The goal for both communities is to comply with the new laws without compromising community values, according to town officials. Officials have drafts and are preparing to hear from residents during the first week of November before they are finalized. The new laws go into effect January 2026, NHPR reported.
Both Hanover and Lebanon have been under scrutiny from the state and federal government for the immigrant-friendly policies. In May, both towns appeared on the list of "Sanctuary Jurisdictions Defying Federal Law," which was compiled by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The list has since been updated and neither community is currently listed. It is unclear if they were removed since the Legislature passed the new laws. Since Governor Kelly Ayotte signed the two anti-sanctuary laws in mid-May, local officials have to figure out whether to change these policies or face prosecution from the New Hampshire Attorney General and lose 25% of their state funding.
If they do not comply, Hanover risks losing about $350,000 unless they change a 2020 fair-and-impartial policing policy that prevents town police from asking people about their immigration status or cooperating with ICE. Specifically, the town could lose a significant portion of their rooms and meals tax revenue, as well as state highway grants.
After the two laws were signed, several Hanover residents encouraged the selectboard to oppose ICE during a Town Meeting in late May. They voted in favor or a warrant article to not partner with federal immigration enforcement.
However, with the new laws going into effect in January, the Hanover selectboard met on Monday, October 20 to edit the policy. They voted in favor of a draft resolution that would comply with state law, but go no further.
"It's crystal clear that the Hanover PD will cooperate with ICE if there are reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, not just randomly," said Selectboard Member Joanna Whitcomb. Before the change can be made final, residents will have the chance to share their opinions at a public hearing on November 3.
Lebanon is in a similar situation. It has a welcoming ordinance in place that could clash with the new state laws. The city's draft resolution says that officials are allowed to cooperate with ICE if they get a judicial warrant or a right to now request.
City Manager Andrew Hosmer said the issue is scheduled for a city council meeting on November 5 and the public is welcome to attend. "No final decision has been made," he said. "The city remains committed to following the law, while upholding the community's values of being welcoming and inclusive for all residents."
For corrections or revisions, click here.
The opinions reflected in this article are not necessarily the opinions of LET
Comments