Where Have All The Journalists Gone?

Written by Patrick Welsh

Once upon a time, the thesis (idea) was that the media and politics were not to be in bed with each other. In fact, the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, adopted Dec.  15, 1791, states: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. 

We then only need to look at the following two documents that expressly spell out the professional independence and ethical responsibilities of journalists, and use them, on their face, to understand why the media (press of all kinds) can no longer be trusted and democratic journalism is dead. 

Preamble 

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. Ethical journalism strives to ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair and thorough. An ethical journalist acts with integrity. 

The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical journalism and encourages their use in its practice by all people in all media. 

Seek Truth and Report It 

Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting, and interpreting information. 

Journalists should: 

• Take responsibility for the accuracy of their work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original sources whenever possible. 

• Remember that neither speed nor format excuses inaccuracy. 

• Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting,  previewing or summarizing a story.

• Gather, update and correct information throughout the life of a news story.
• Be cautious when making promises, but keep the promises they make.
• Identify sources clearly. The public is entitled to as much information as possible to judge the reliability and motivations of sources. 

• Consider sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Reserve anonymity for sources who may face danger, retribution or other harm, and have information that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Explain why anonymity was granted. 

• Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing.
• Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public. 

• Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless. 

• Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
• Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all. 

• Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate.
• Boldly tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience. Seek sources whose voices we seldom hear. 

• Avoid stereotyping. Journalists should examine the ways their values and experiences may shape their reporting. 

• Label advocacy and commentary. 

• Never deliberately distort facts or context, including visual information. Clearly label illustrations and re-enactments. 

• Never plagiarize. Always attribute. 

Minimize Harm 

Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should: 

            • Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort.  Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness.

            • Show compassion for those who may be affected by news coverage. Use heightened sensitivity when dealing with juveniles, victims of sex crimes, and sources or subjects who are inexperienced or unable to give consent. Consider cultural differences in approach and treatment. 

• Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast. 

• Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention.  Weigh the consequences of publishing or broadcasting personal information.
• Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do. 
• Balance a suspect’s right to a fair trial with the public’s right to know. Consider the implications of identifying criminal suspects before they face legal charges.
• Consider the long-term implications of the extended reach and permanence of publication. Provide updated and more complete information as appropriate. 

Act Independently 

The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public. 

Journalists should: 

• Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived. Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
• Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and avoid political and other outside activities that may compromise integrity or impartiality, or may damage credibility.
• Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; do not pay for access to news. Identify content provided by outside sources, whether paid or not.

• Deny favored treatment to advertisers, donors or any other special interests, and resist internal and external pressure to influence coverage. 

• Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two. Prominently label sponsored content. 

Be Accountable and Transparent 

Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public. 

Journalists should: 

• Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news content. 

• Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness. 

• Acknowledge mistakes and correct them promptly and prominently. Explain corrections and clarifications carefully and clearly. 

• Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations.
• Abide by the same high standards they expect of others.” 

Source: Society of Professional Journalists, 1909 

The Journalist's Creed is a personal and professional affirmation and code of journalism ethics written by Walter Williams in 1914. A bronze plaque of The Journalist's Creed hangs at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. 

• I believe in the profession of journalism. 

• I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust. 

• I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism. 

• I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.
• I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.

• I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one’s own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as  bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another’s instructions or another’s dividends. 

• I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service. 

• I believe that the journalism which succeeds best — and best deserves success — fears God and honors Man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or  greed of power, constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient,  always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice;  is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human  brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a  journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world. 

So, where have all the journalist gone? They certainly are not on main stream media. At best, we have political activists, political apologists, antagonists and the occasional looney-tunes posing as journalists sucking up perfectly good oxygen the rest of need to survive and merely raising the collective blood pressure of millions of viewers, listeners, and readers. 

But, alas, fare thee well Journalism, we knew thee well. Whatever shall we do? I really  have no clue, other than to speak up and demand a return to the professional and ethical journalism (see above) that the so called journalist so flippantly disregard. What say you main stream media? Defend yourselves, I dare you. 

About the Author:
From being left in orphanage in Dublin, Ireland at 3 days old, to being adopted to the USA 16 months later,
Pat Welsh has been on a life long journey to become a Warrior, Servant, Leader.

In the Warrior Servant Leader Podcast, Pat shares the inspiring stories and lessons learned, personally and
professionally, as he features TACO TUESDAYS - Take Action Crush Obstacles. Buckle up, he doesn’t hold back.

Contact Pat: pjwelshllc@gmail.com or at https://www.thewarriorservantleaderpodcast.com
For corrections or revisions, click here.
The opinions reflected in this article are not necessarily the opinions of LET
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by LET CMS™ Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

Get latest news delivered daily!

We will send you breaking news right to your inbox

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
image
© 2025 Law Enforcement Today, Privacy Policy