WASHINGTON, DC - While Democrats and the media have been focusing on the shiny object of the January 6, 2021 siege at the U.S. Capitol, another incident that occurred that day has been ignored. This incident, involving the discovery of pipe bombs, is possibly much more serious than what occurred at the Capitol. It raises a lot of questions and underscores the need for further investigation and public engagement.
On January 6, pipe bombs were found outside the headquarters of both the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC). That discovery was overshadowed by the events at the Capitol on that date, which probably was fortunate for the deep state until independent journalists began to question that event.
In March 2021, Revolver News began digging into the pipe bomb issue and dropped a series of investigative reports, blowing the lid off the story. In one report, Revolver looked at surveillance footage of when the bomb at the DNC, and the findings were shocking. The footage suggested that the Secret Service detail assigned to then-Senator Kamala Harris, the vice president-elect, was in on a cover-up.
Considering primarily Democratic lawmakers at the Capitol spoke about their “brush with death” at the hands of grandmothers in walkers at the Capitol, Harris has never said a word about her apparent brush with death at the DNC, where she was when the pipe bomb was “discovered.”
Focus on the Secret Service has escalated after the failed assassination attempt on Harris’s 2024 presidential rival, Donald Trump, in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. The ties between Harris, the Secret Service, and the pipe bomb cover-up is, according to Revolver News, “one of the most consequential scandals and cover-ups in the country.”
After Revolver News released its investigative piece detailing the video surveillance footage released by the Capitol Police from their cameras, the focus was directed toward that footage, although the mainstream media widely ignored it.
When the FBI released footage of the pipe bomber, they utilized surveillance footage supplied by the DNC. The FBI ostensibly released the footage to get public assistance in identifying the pipe bomber.
The Capitol Police footage that showed discovery of the pipe bomb seemed to include one that had a convenient blind spot at the bench where the pipe bomb was planted. After the pipe bomb was discovered, not when it was planted, did someone radio the camera operator and have them pan over to the bench where the pipe bomb was located?
The DNC cameras, however, had at least two cameras that provided a view of the benches and location where the pipe bomb was planted, Revolver News reports. Revolver included screenshots depicting the view from the DNC cameras on January 5, 2021, when the FBI says (and surveillance footing suggests) the pipe bombs were planted.
The DNC cameras do not have the specific location in view and don’t have the “blind spots” the Capitol Police cameras have, they have blind spots of their own. In fact, when the FBI released video footage from those cameras, Revolver News noted issues with the footage released to the public.
First, the FBI withheld footage from DNC camera #1 from the public, which would have shown the suspect planting the pipe bomb. The video clearly shows a suspect in a light-colored hoodie and dark pants placing the bomb adjacent to the bench.
Revolver News later reported that the frame rate of the DNC footage appeared to have been tampered with, thereby making it more difficult for the bomber to be identified by the public. It was determined that the frame rate on the DNC footage was under two frames per second, while the cheapest commercially available video security cameras, such as those found at convenience store gas stations, have eight frames per second.
That belies not only common sense but also belief. Why would the DNC’s security cameras be so rudimentary? That would beg the question, when was the surveillance footage degraded? Originally or after it reached the FBI? Given the questions surrounding the FBI over the past eight years or so, is it too much to expect that there wasn’t anything underhanded involved with the surveillance video? Apparently, it is not.
Revolver News spoke with “a very trusted government source,” who told them a government official (not affiliated with the FBI) viewed 45 minutes of DNC surveillance video early in 2022. The footage was from the evening of January 5. Footage from the DNC cameras on January 6 would have shown the discovery of the DNC bomb (minus the Capitol Police footage with blind spots) had been deleted for unknown reasons.
The official in question said the DNC footage they watched clearly depicted the suspect planting the pipe bomb and didn’t note any problem with frame rate or picture clarity, Revolver News said. The footage was not provided by the FBI but was viewed at the DNC building.
The information revealing a government official viewed footage from the DNC camera clearly depicting the suspect planting the bomb should have been released to the public if the FBI was truly interested in finding out who planted the bomb.Why wasn’t it? Moreover, the official reported no issues with frame rate, nor was there any quality degradation as the copy shown to the public had.
There are more questions than answers about the DNC footage, primarily why the January 6 footage was deleted while the January 5 footage was not. Why would the government official gone to the DNC to view the video footage instead of to the FBI? One would think, Revolver notes, that a government official would logically go to a government law enforcement agency to view the footage. Why didn’t they?
Had the FBI also deleted the January 5 footage, forcing the official to view it at the DNC? If the FBI did indeed either lose or delete the video footage in what they called an “active and highest priority” investigation, why?
There are theories that the pipe bombs were initially planted to convince the American people that Trump supporters were crazed lunatics who were doing whatever it took to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election. The events at the US Capitol allowed that plan to be scuttled since they had their “insurrection.” ‘
Revolver News will continue digging into this issue, and we will report their findings.
Comments